But why? Governments have secret, big deal, why the hell would you unveil private discussions between political leaders? Those "freedom fighters" are reinforcing paranoia among the weakest minds. Some information can't be handled properly by everyone, lack of political and economical knowledge, or simply lack of empathy toward social issues can lead to big misinterpretations.
What happened to free press? if WikiLeaks wants to write about it, it's their good right. To be honest, even if all of it were true, what do I care. In the end I live a satisfying life and I'm sure more people can say the same. The fact that we're covertly getting plucked left and right doesn't bug me. I don't believe I will become "happier" when people and organisations show their true worth.
Id pick Donald because he'd help me grab em by the p**** . I'm kidding Still I'd pick Donald because id like to see what happens. I'm living with my dad right now and he knows how to argue like a champ. So in theory id be watching a 4 year long debate about politics I'd bet I would learn a lot from it.
Would you rather walk on broken glass for 15minutes or lick the walls of a public toilet.
Broken glass for 15 minutes for sure. I have hypochondria and since pain is an experience rather than a fact I can dampen the pain by simply believing that I can!
If you had to give up one of the two, would it be your best lover or your best friend?
This is a little forum game, much like the three-word game and word association game.
Game: Offer a choice to the next poster. The next poster has to choose one of the two choices. He or she is free to elaborate as to why he or she chose one option over the alternative, but it is not a necessity. After choosing an option, a new entry has to be formed so that the next poster has a choice to make as well!
Rules: A choice may never target somebody personally, or be written in such manner that one can derive who it is about. This game shall never be personal towards anybody. Other than that, everything goes! The most lonesome, grotesque, unethical or fantastic choices are all fair game!
Commenting on somebody's optional explanation is not allowed; this would cause the thread to unravel.
Player 1: Would you rather live in utmost poverty with your loved one or live in exceeding wealth with your favourite pet?
Player 2: Live in poverty with my loved one (, because .. .... ..). If you had to do one of two things, would you rather: drink a gallon of sea water or eat 20 hamburgers? Note: they are hamburgers from the supermarket, not the edible ones from Burger King.
I'll start off with one of the more recent developments.
If you had to invite one of the two to your home for a period of 4 years, would you rather invite Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton?