St0rmSlaSh Posted March 19, 2016 Author Posted March 19, 2016 You lost me at "I like Windows XP....." smh It's not a bad OS. I mean, I would prefer windows 7, but I don't mind XP Quote
-=HipKat=- Posted March 19, 2016 Posted March 19, 2016 I think XP was the WORST OS MS ever put out. Terrible., It was ugly, slow, devoured resources, needed 3 A/V-Spyware programs running in the background because of all the security holes. Slow, depended on IE and anything you left open would freeze if you left it alone for too long 1 Quote
St0rmSlaSh Posted March 19, 2016 Author Posted March 19, 2016 I think XP was the WORST OS MS ever put out. Terrible., It was ugly, slow, devoured resources, needed 3 A/V-Spyware programs running in the background because of all the security holes. Slow, depended on IE and anything you left open would freeze if you left it alone for too long That does not happen to me I have malwarebytes on this pc and it detects some things, but they never come back And you can also change the looks of i as well Quote
Leader RedBaird Posted March 19, 2016 Leader Posted March 19, 2016 I think XP was the WORST OS MS ever put out. Terrible., It was ugly, slow, devoured resources, needed 3 A/V-Spyware programs running in the background because of all the security holes. Slow, depended on IE and anything you left open would freeze if you left it alone for too long You must have been doing something wrong! I thought that Windows Me or Vista were the ones with lowest opinion rating. 1 Quote
-=HipKat=- Posted March 19, 2016 Posted March 19, 2016 You must have been doing something wrong! I thought that Windows Me or Vista were the ones with lowest opinion rating. I was ok with Vista, ME... meh! I wish I was doing something wrong but one thing I know how to do is tweak and streamline a computer. I hated XP 2 Quote
Ol Smoke Posted March 19, 2016 Posted March 19, 2016 I was building systems during the time of Windows Me. I built two. Went back to 98Se. Stayed with it till Win2000. Never built a system with Vista.I stayed with XP. 1 Quote
Xernicus Posted March 20, 2016 Posted March 20, 2016 I occurs mostly on web browsing. When I play ET though, it never happens. OK, lets get what Windows has set as the default gateway address via ipconfig. You'll get an output like this: Wireless LAN adapter Wi-Fi: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : PK5001Z IPv6 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : fd00::7851:d246:e81b:2ac9 Temporary IPv6 Address. . . . . . : fd00::571:29df:42ae:4b6e Temporary IPv6 Address. . . . . . : fd00::28de:4940:1af8:da86 Temporary IPv6 Address. . . . . . : fd00::4896:ab48:7505:5ed7 Temporary IPv6 Address. . . . . . : fd00::4951:b9b4:b99d:c6ba Temporary IPv6 Address. . . . . . : fd00::5028:8e0a:8bf6:fe06 Temporary IPv6 Address. . . . . . : fd00::804e:3466:2207:cfe4 Temporary IPv6 Address. . . . . . : fd00::b0e8:29e6:3927:e616 Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::7851:d246:e81b:2ac9%4 IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.103 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.1 Now let's run a tracert to make sure that your default gateway is indeed the modem, and not just a router. What we're going to be looking for here is two 192.168.x.x (or any other local-only reserved IPs) addresses over the first two hops. Tracing route to fearless-assassins.com [144.76.100.131] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 2 ms 2 ms 1 ms PK5001Z.PK5001Z [192.168.0.1] 2 38 ms 37 ms 38 ms tukw-dsl-gw67.tukw.qwest.net [63.231.10.67] 3 38 ms 38 ms 37 ms tukw-agw1.inet.qwest.net [71.217.186.17] 4 * 39 ms * sea-brdr-02.inet.qwest.net [67.14.41.194] 5 38 ms 38 ms 38 ms 63.146.26.54 6 39 ms 38 ms 38 ms if-0-0-0.core1.00S-Seattle.as6453.net [64.86.123.2] 7 199 ms 201 ms 205 ms if-5-1-0-0.tcore2.CT8-Chicago.as6453.net [206.82.141.9] 8 190 ms 190 ms 189 ms if-22-2.tcore1.CT8-Chicago.as6453.net [64.86.79.2] 9 193 ms 194 ms 193 ms if-26-2.tcore2.NTO-New-York.as6453.net [216.6.81.28] 10 206 ms 189 ms 194 ms if-8-2.tcore1.NTO-New-York.as6453.net [63.243.128.69] 11 193 ms 190 ms 191 ms if-11-2.tcore2.L78-London.as6453.net [63.243.128.38] 12 192 ms 191 ms 194 ms if-8-2.tcore2.AV2-Amsterdam.as6453.net [80.231.131.6] 13 192 ms 201 ms 194 ms if-2-2.tcore1.AV2-Amsterdam.as6453.net [195.219.194.5] 14 190 ms 188 ms 189 ms if-6-4.tcore1.FNM-Frankfurt.as6453.net [195.219.156.61] 15 191 ms 193 ms 191 ms if-7-2.tcore1.FR0-Frankfurt.as6453.net [195.219.50.1] 16 204 ms 216 ms 205 ms 195.219.219.10 17 211 ms 209 ms 210 ms core22.hetzner.de [213.239.245.17] 18 209 ms 209 ms 209 ms juniper4.rz19.hetzner.de [213.239.245.150] 19 208 ms 210 ms 212 ms hos-tr3.ex3k24.rz19.hetzner.de [213.239.243.202] 20 291 ms 252 ms 255 ms fearless-assassins.com [144.76.100.131] Trace complete. If you see two local-only IPs at the first two hops, then I may be on the right track. If there's just one, then we may be looking at an interface/driver problem. That doesn't quite "add up" to me though... Life tip: When I was your age, when I'd run into problems like this I was tempted to 'nuke' the OS installation and start from scratch too. But rarely ever does this fix the problem at hand. All you're doing is bypassing it. Now when you step right over a problem, then you do not learn how to fix it. And in IT, you need fixes and solutions-- you can't just be nuking customer's / the company's computers and expect to make it out still employed (even if you make backups). It's just not good practice. 2 Quote
Leader RedBaird Posted March 20, 2016 Leader Posted March 20, 2016 FYI: I get two IPv6 addresses for the first two 'hops' through a cable/wireless/phone router (or whatever device it actually is ). 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.