Night Hunter Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 DICE has confirmed upcoming multiplayer shooter Star Wars Battlefront does not feature a server browser. Instead, it uses a new "skill-based" matchmaking system. Confirmation came from EA community manager Sledgehammer70, who took to the Star Wars Battlefront subreddit to say: Star Wars Battlefront will not offer a server browser, but will utilize a new skill based matchmaking system. The reaction to the news has been overwhelmingly negative, with many criticising the decision particularly in relation to the PC version of the game. Server browsers are popular among many players of multiplayer-focused titles because they offer choice, letting players search for games using filters such as ping, map, number of players, game modes and, perhaps most importantly, presence of friends. Much of the anger has to do with an expectation that Star Wars Battlefront would work similarly to DICE's Battlefield series, which has featured a server browser for a number of years. Battlefield 4, for example, runs a Rent-A-Server program that lets players pay to set up their private and public Battlefield 4 servers, tweaking everything from player count to map rotation. You can see a list of active Battlefield 4 servers on Battlelog. DICE and EA may be going for a more user-friendly system this time around as it's dealing with a Star Wars game and a potentially broader audience than it's used to with the Battlefield series. And it's important to note that DICE is yet to explain how its new skill-based matchmaking system works, or confirm whether there will be a way to set up custom matches. Perhaps we shouldn't be surprised by the lack of a server browser. Star Wars Battlefront already deviates from the Battlefield formula in a number of important ways. For example, Battlefront players will be able to freely pick their weapons and gear, whereas soldier classes are staples of the Battlefield series. Instead of squads, another Battlefield staple, Battlefront uses its Partners feature that lets two players play together. Here, the two players can see each other on their heads-up display and spawn on each other. Star Wars Battlefront does not feature a campaign, either. Rather, it features "crafted missions" that are played solo, with a friend via split-screen offline or cooperatively online. The game has a maximum player count of 40, and during battles players can switch from a first-person perspective to a third-person perspective at will. And DICE has confirmed that unlike Battlefield, Star Wars Battlefront does not feature aim-down-ironsights. "We're not taking into account what we've done before, because I think that would be disrespectful to the fans, and to what we're trying to achieve here," executive producer Patrick Bach has said. "A lot of the things you saw in the game have nothing to do with anything we've done before. Some features of course resemble [our other shooters], because we want to make the best possible shooter, but in general we've tried to do something completely unique." Source http://www.eurogamer.net/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St0rmSlaSh Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 God, can't wait for this game! 'm a hardcore star wars fan!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiD Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 I was excited. Now I'm completely apathetic. Another generic shit matchmaking system with no way to deal with constant shit teams, smurf account players, or hackers. I'm over Dice as a dev. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AcidParadox Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Things like this are the reason why clans are dying on modern games. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St0rmSlaSh Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 True. True. Things like this are the reason why clans are dying on modern games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic121 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Instead, it uses a new "skill-based" matchmaking system. [soon after...] 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelly Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Heretic after a careful analysis of your past posts I have come to the conclusion: you like that picture. On topic: While this game is obviously turning out to be a pretty big disappoint based off the other battlefront in terms of stuff being taken out. I am wondering though if it is a game worth buying if it didn't have to live up to. I honestly think it looks pretty good, even if it is just a different skinned battlefield. Some of my main concerns is how buggy it will be? Recent launches have been extremely buggy. Will I be able to get into a game? I want to be able to hop right into a game. Along the same lines will I be able to easily party up with friends, more important on consoles, but since there is no server browser it will be more relevant to PC players too. I also saw one beta preview(only video of sw bf I watched) where the person was not lasting more than 30 seconds each life. That would drive me nuts. I hope the guy was just absolutely terrible and it wasn't some failed game mechanic. And of course the micro transactions/premium stuff I can't remember what the status was on this. But in battlefield where "premium" players got access to more weapons it was just stupid for a multiplayer game. Anyways none of these questions can truly be answered until the game is out by people who paid to play the game not people are getting paid to play it. /endrant 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.