*Appel* Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 Now it is proven that the Assad- empery had used chemical weponry during the syria- conflict since april 2009. Cause this fact USA would support syrian insurgents with "light" weapons. ( No cruelty relief like tanks or artillary even these are the most requested help rebels asked for ) What do you think, F|A, would this acces end the war in syria or would it just activate government squads? I think this is the most important question. European and Americans are in top ranking position so they have to help all civilians in syria who suffer under the force and wars in their home country. Over 1,5 millions of refugees are on the run and try to survive in neighboring contries. These men, women and (!) children need our help from all over the world, but what if the requested weapons arrive terrorists or the Assad Regime? It is fleshly to help humans in time of need, isn't it? But the only thing we have to consider is the consequence for all preservers, if they do not assist terrorism. A complex question. Therefore I want to know your opinion? Would you follow USA statement and support syrian rebels or would it be a equitable decision to allow all (maybe helpful) arms transfer, just to protect yourself? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gibson66 Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 If we get our hands dirty in the conflict, they say we're using our military to assert our dominance on a global scale. If we stay out of the war, they say we aren't fulfilling our role as a global peace-keeping force. There's no right answer. And as awful as this sounds, a brutal dictator can keep a lid on extremists. Should Assad fall (and the syrian state will go with him), it's very likely we'll see a surge of political and religious extremists. And to be frank, we've got enough on our plate. We really don't need another war. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Maluco. Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 Always the same thing. Innocent suffering men, women and children victimized by some executioner, dictator or whatever Is history repeating itself even if it is never learned? Does anyone still believe that military intervention is really to protect democracy or the people? People still absurdly naive? Since the civil war fought in their own country is the same thing (Mentioning only USA) because it's much older than you think Always the same tactic for thousands of years This rebellion certainly ALSO is being funded by people genuinely interested in ... nvm ... is useless to try to explain I just hope that one day you guys awake. and stop dying to defend third party companies and banks Because surely is unrelated to defend the people There or your own peace.......... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gibson66 Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 Always the same thing. Innocent suffering men, women and children victimized by some executioner, dictator or whatever Is history repeating itself even if it is never learned? Does anyone still believe that military intervention is really to protect democracy or the people? People still absurdly naive? Since the civil war fought in their own country is the same thing (Mentioning only USA) because it's much older than you think Always the same tactic for thousands of years This rebellion certainly ALSO is being funded by people genuinely interested in ... nvm ... is useless to try to explain I just hope that one day you guys awake. and stop dying to defend third party companies and banks Because surely is unrelated to defend the people There or your own peace.......... What.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b0rR*4cHo Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 If we get our hands dirty in the conflict, they say we're using our military to assert our dominance on a global scale. If we stay out of the war, they say we aren't fulfilling our role as a global peace-keeping force. There's no right answer. And as awful as this sounds, a brutal dictator can keep a lid on extremists. Should Assad fall (and the syrian state will go with him), it's very likely we'll see a surge of political and religious extremists. And to be frank, we've got enough on our plate. We really don't need another war. can i add to this how much our last war added to our national debt... aka we cannot afford it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.