I have a problem

[Lorenzo Battistutta]

I love Gemini

[Sputnik]

On 10/6/2025 at 10:26 PM, Lorenzo Battistutta said:

Instead, I, after doing a lot of tests, have noticed that at 128 my bullets come out slowly compared to other opponents I face head-on. Changing to com_hunkmegs 1024, the PC is amazing; when jay1 is completely full, they go down like bowling pins in a game, while at 128 and 192, the reaction time for how many seconds it takes for the rifle's clip to empty against an opponent with a high-performance PC is noticeable. Have you ever done these tests? Because when you encounter someone who shoots well and you shoot first, even if you shoot them from behind, they never die; they turn around, pim pim pim, and you're dead. It's frustrating.

depends, my hunkmegs are at whatever the prompt told me to set them to

 

I'm gaming on an ex-japanese office bog standard dell from I guess 15/16 years ago that I bought for $104, using a $1 thrift store no brand mouse, no mousepad and the cheapest APOINT keyboard I could find ($5)

 

wifi is through 4G/5G cellular data to a seven year old Huawei base model phone creating a mobile hotspot picked up my computer's unbranded wireless antenna and my ping is always around 230/270 

 

and I can kill the best players in these servers

 

granted they might kill me more often but still

 

as you level up your xp you become more powerful in game

[captnconcrete]

On 10/6/2025 at 10:16 AM, *Kiba* said:

will from other posts i seen that the max  com_hunkMegs   128  it's ET i don't think you need more than that  

it's what i have my cfg set to i had some of the best work on it  so i know it's right and it's has not been that long since it was updated  

i believe its 192 for hunk max u can change it higher but et doesnt use anymore than that. 

[Lorenzo Battistutta]

On 10/12/2025 at 4:31 PM, captnconcrete said:

i believe its 192 for hunk max u can change it higher but et doesnt use anymore than that. 

It has 192, I have a bottleneck with jerks, whereas 512 is excellent

 

These days I am playing like this:
cl_maxpackets 125
r_displayrefresh 125
com_maxfps 125
rate 30000/35000
I am connected via smartphone 4G tethering via the USB port 2.0 (only 480mb/s)

Ping statistics for 135.148.137.185: Jay1
Packets: Sent = 15, Received = 15,
Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milliseconds:
Minimum = 129ms, Maximum = 173ms, Average = 149ms
Control-C
^C
C:WindowsSystem32>

 

Edited October 14, 2025 by Lorenzo Battistutta

[Lorenzo Battistutta]

Has any of you ever tried USB tethering for gaming? Is it better than Wi-Fi?

[*Kiba*]

8 minutes ago, Lorenzo Battistutta said:

Has any of you ever tried USB tethering for gaming? Is it better than Wi-Fi?

i didn't have mine setup on wifi but i did have it tether throw a USB port with cable line on my old pc the net port got burned out by a lighting storm so i had to get a usb plug in to get net on my pc i'm not a fan of wifi gaming it's never 100% stable even when it say it's stable your still getting hit with a mass ping of over 100 off just using wifi not saying all wifi that bad but from what i seen it can be  right now i have my old pc set up on wifi   on 2x xps i have a ping of over 110 on my normal servers were i can get a ping of 0  to 15 on cable hook up 32 to 50 unstable  with wifi

Edited October 14, 2025 by *Kiba*