Pvt. Parts Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 Hello everyone if you have seen my application you would have saw that i am doing a car restoration for my senior project and wanted to do a mustang. I originally wanted to do a 1969 fastback but i have a friend who does this for a living and he said doing that car would cost a minimum of 25k for a good job. He then said that doing a late 90s or early 2000s would be better and way cheaper to repair. Now i was looking at a 2004 mustang gt and i personally do not like the interior much but love the look of the body. I was wondering if anyone who knows anything about cars or has done a project like this if it would be a good idea to buy the 04 and do mostly interior work to make it more "modern" or buy an 05 with an interior i like and do mostly body/engine work. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Quote
NormanCorn Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 Engine work is always more gratifying to me. Are you dead set on the Mustang? Depending on your likes, an older Corolla (AE86, mmmm) or Integra (my first car was a '91) may be fun. Quote
Pvt. Parts Posted July 2, 2014 Author Posted July 2, 2014 Im dead set on the mustang, i want that American muscle haha although i was thinking about 1970 Chevelle SS Quote
gibson66 Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 1966 mustang. Parts are cheaper. Trust me, I've got one. 1 Quote
CaRaNo Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 (edited) I've got a Fiat - they're shit... Any help to ya? Edited July 2, 2014 by WarPeD Quote
EVIL BUTTERS Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 I've got a Fiat - they're shit... Any help to ya? At least they have hot girls on the TV trying to sell them LOL ....... 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.