Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Lately I have seen regulars submitting demos of cheaters.  However, sometimes they are submitted, because there is no admin on or they are submitted as supplementary evidence.  But we don't know this based off the form as it reads.  If they are banned, there might not be a posting about it in the private area for a day or two and so we have admin waiting for the cheater to show up. 

 

I proposition the form be updated as marked in the ss.

 

 

post-8873-0-90912500-1370974919_thumb.png

  • Like 1
Posted

I can agree to this as I've stumbled upon this a couple times in the last few days. A regular will post a demo that I will review and give my opinion on, only to find out later it was just their version of a demo and they were indeed banned by an admin at that time.

  • 1 month later...
  • Administrators
Posted

I have updated few things... More complicated reports are not required .. lets just keep paper work to minimal. 

  • Like 2
Posted

Coolio, was just wondering. It is the suggestion section anywho.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.