Jump to content

US military wants to demonstrate new nuclear power systems in space by 2027.


LazyHippo

Recommended Posts

That's just one year after DARPA plans to test out its own nuclear power prototypes.
 

image.thumb.jpeg.665526b180934efe0e6174a67e81f9de.jpeg

An artist's illustration of an Ultra Safe Nuclear battery in space on a test flight for the U.S. Defense Innovation Unit. (Image credit: DIU)
 

Add the Defense Innovation Unit to a growing list of U.S. government organizations furthering their work in nuclear power in pace.

The organization, which seeks to get the military ready to use emergent commercial products, announced two prototype contracts on May 17 "to demonstrate the next generation of nuclear propulsion and power capability for spacecraft." The ultimate aim is an orbital flight demonstration in 2027, DIU officials said in a statement. 

 

The contracts went to two companies, Ultra Safe Nuclear and Avalanche Energy,  to demonstrate nuclear propulsion and power capabilities for small spacecraft that would operate in cislunar (Earth-moon) space. (The values of the contracts were not disclosed in the release.)

 

It's part of the U.S. military's pressing focus on cislunar activities to keep an eye on commercial and government activities that will ramp up there in the coming decades, including the international NASA-led Artemis program that seeks to put people on the moon in the 2020s.
 

image.jpeg.e8f851cfa55edc65da692ad2e46aa623.jpeg

The U.S. military is interested in monitoring cislunar space as government and commercial activities increase in the sector. (Image credit: NASA)
 

If all goes to plan, Ultra Safe Nuclear will demonstrate EmberCore, a chargeable, nuclear radioisotope battery useful for propulsion and power. 

"This 'next-gen' radioisotope system will be able to scale to 10 times higher power levels, compared to plutonium systems, and provide more than 1 million kilowatt hours (kWh) of energy in just a few kilograms of fuel," DIU stated.

 

Avalanche Energy's Orbitron seeks to trap fusion ions in electrostatic fields, with assistance from a magnetron to keep the electrons closer to their nuclei (atom cores) than what is usually possible.

 

"The resulting fusion burn then produces the energetic particles that generate either heat or electricity, which can power a high-efficiency propulsion system," DIU stated. "Compared to other fusion concepts, Orbitron devices are promising for space applications as they may be scaled down in size and enable their use as both a propulsion and power source. "

 

image.jpeg.eb264b6541c09dc96dbc1fe094f802ac.jpeg

Nuclear thermal rockets, like the one in this artistic rendering, could halve the time needed for a Mars mission. (Image credit: Pat Rawlings/NASA)
 

Another military organization seeking cislunar nuclear technology is the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). On May 4, the organization announced it is ready to move forward on a project to design, develop and assemble a nuclear thermal rocket engine for an expected flight demonstration in Earth orbit by 2026.

 

The proposals will support DARPA's Demonstration Rocket for Agile Cislunar Operations (DRACO) program, which aims to develop a nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) system for use in Earth-moon space.

 

NTP uses fission reactors to heat hydrogen or other propellants and shoot them out of nozzles for thrust, generating a thrust-to-weight ratio 10,000 times higher than electric propulsion systems. It also improves upon chemical rockets, as the propulsion efficiency (specific impulse) of NTPs is about two to five times higher, DARPA officials wrote in a description of the DRACO program.

 

NASA is looking into NTPs as well. Such systems could bring astronauts to Mars in half the time than current propulsion systems (which would take six to nine months). NASA's fiscal 2023 budget request, not yet approved by Congress, includes $15 million to support nuclear propulsion, and NASA is collaborating in the DRACO project too.

 

Edited by LazyHippo
  • Like 1
  • Surprise 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.