sketchy Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 Beta radiation levels are off the charts at monitoring sites all across North America, according to new reports. But experts are blaming these radiation spikes on practically everything except for Fukushima.Data gathered from tracking units in California, Arizona, Illinois and elsewhere reveal radiation levels up to 50,000 percent higher than what was observed at the same time last year, and in some cases compared to levels seen this past summer.EnviroReporter.com says the impacted sites are scattered throughout the country and aren't just confined to the West Coast. Readings taken near Los Angeles; Chicago; Montgomery, Alabama; and Madison, Wisconsin, reveal total beta counts per minute (CPM) greatly exceeding the 1,000 CPM threshold considered by the government to be problematic.In Tucson, Arizona, for instance, a 460 CPM reading was recently taken, which is more than 10 times higher than the reading taken last year on November 27. Similarly, Phoenix, Arizona's 735 CPM reading measured more than 21 times higher than last year's reading.San Diego appears to be one of the hardest-hit areas, with a CPM reading of 650, as of October 1. This figure is 60 times higher than it was last year on the same date, despite the fact that San Diego's normal background radiation rate typically hovers around 20 CPM."U.S. Environmental Protection Agency RadNet radiation monitors have detected renewed surges in atmospheric readings of dangerous beta radiation across the country," explains EnviroReporter.com about the seemingly inexplicable phenomenon."Over a dozen metropolitan test sites have registered four-month highs in EnviroReporter.com's most recent comprehensive assessment."Radiation testing site near Chicago records radiation levels thousands of times higher than maximum safety thresholdCommenting on the situation, one EnviroReporter.com reader offered his own assessment that these readings are "astronomically high." He was quick to denounce Fukushima as a possible cause, though, adding that this would only be possible if "something there has changed dramatically."Either way, the radiation levels being detected are still a major cause for concern. Anything above 100 CPM is considered by the California Highway Patrol (CHP) to be a potential hazardous materials situation requiring the deployment of hazmat protocols.At a testing site in St. Charles, Illinois, located just west of Chicago, a recent peak reading of 7,298 CPM caught the attention of some environmental activists, who chided the media for remaining silent on the issue.This reading represents a nearly 7,300 percent radiation increase beyond CHP's safety threshold. This site apparently experienced a series of massive radiation spikes beginning at approximately 1:00 am and lasting for as long as six hours.California official blames plastic eating utensils for radiation spike, insist it can't be FukushimaBack in California, county officials in San Mateo recorded radiation levels at a local beach measuring 100 micro-REM per hour, or 1 microsievert per hour, which is five times the normal amount. According to the Half Moon Bay Review, local environmental health director Dean Peterson was quick to denounce that this level poses any risk to human health.When asked where this radiation might be coming from, Peterson admitted that he is "befuddled," but also denied that Fukushima could possibly be a cause. Instead, he says, it may be due to an excess of disposable eating utensils polluting the area."I honestly think the end result of this is that it's just higher levels of background radiation," stated Peterson to the HMB Review, adding that red-painted disposable eating utensils can also contribute to localized radiation spikes.One site which allows for local monitoring is http://www.radiationnetwork.com/DetailMaps.htmSources:http://beforeitsnews.comhttp://netc.comhttp://enenews.comhttp://enenews.comhttp://www.enviroreporter.comhttp://www.hmbreview.comhttp://science.naturalnews.comJoin over four million monthly readers. Your privacy is protected. Unsubscribe at any time.More news on radiation levelsTepco admits to misreporting radiation levels by 500%Radiation levels in tuna tripled after FukushimaRadiation levels at Fukushima plant increases to 800% of government standardScientists surprised by variability in radiation levels in different areas of Pacific OceanChernobyl scientist discovers antioxidants help body adapt to radiationThyroid cancer cases rise near Fukushima as schoolchildren flee radiationArea around Fukushima plant is now a 'swamp of radioactive material' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader RedBaird Posted December 16, 2014 Leader Share Posted December 16, 2014 I don't find your sources very reliable. The home page of the first source, http://beforeitsnews.com , starts with a list of their "Top 50 Articles", with titles such as: Nibiru Planet X ‘The Date of Arrival’ An Illuminati Secret NASA Photos Confirm Moon is Artificial? The Time Traveler who Recorded Himself in the Future, On his Cell phone Amazing Keshe Technology: Free Energy, Levitation, Reverse Aging and More! Another site repeated an old canard that UN Tetanus vaccinations for African women contain sterilization chemicals. The tetanus program for women of child-bearing age is to prevent birthing tetanus caused by traditional non-sterile home-birth practices. I looked up the EPA's RadNet records of Gross Beta for Tuscon, Arizona, and they don't use CPM units. I did see two records from adjacent tests that varied by 78%. I am sure that one could pick a day with low radiation from last year and compare it to a higher record from this year and claim that the radiation doubled or tripled in a year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.