Jump to content

Facebook, Google tell the government to stop granting patents for abstract ideas


Corey

Recommended Posts

Google FTC Settlement

Facebook (FB), Google (GOOG) and six other tech companies have petitioned the courts to begin rejecting lawsuits that are based on patents for vague concepts rather than specific applications, TechCrunch reported. The agreement, which was cosigned by Zynga (ZNGA), Dell (DELL), Intuit (INTU), Homeaway (AWAY), Rackspace (RAX), and Red Hat (RHT), notes the only thing these abstract patents do is increase legal fees and slow innovation in the industry. The companies claim that “abstract patents are a plague in the high tech sector” and force innovators into litigation that results in huge settlements or steep licensing fees for technology they have already developed on their own, which then leads to higher prices for consumers.

“Many computer-related patent claims just describe an abstract idea at a high level of generality and say to perform it on a computer or over the Internet,” the briefing reads. “Such barebones claims grant exclusive rights over the abstract idea itself, with no limit on how the idea is implemented. Granting patent protection for such claims would impair, not promote, innovation by conferring exclusive rights on those who have not meaningfully innovated, and thereby penalizing those that do later innovate by blocking or taxing their applications of the abstract idea.”

The companies conclude, “It is easy to think of abstract ideas about what a computer or website should do, but the difficult, valuable, and often groundbreaking part of online innovation comes next: designing, analyzing, building, and deploying the interface, software, and hardware to implement that idea in a way that is useful in daily life. Simply put, ideas are much easier to come by than working implementations.”

b.gif?host=bgr.com&blog=36424464&post=24ljS3Ba9f5UA

 

View the full article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those a***oles spread their tentacles everywhere!

 

I wonder when they will patent languages so we will have to pay royalties for talking.

 

Just check some other industries and see what companies like Nestle (water) and Monsanto (seeds) are doing and how well that goes for communities and end-users.

 

IT giants need to be kept in check before they become too powerful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes because apple is the ONLY company who patents everything...

 

Nope, but it sure is the most aggresive one atm... (not counting patent trolls, that's a whole different league)

 

Software patents are bs to begin with.

Edited by DrJoske
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Software patents are bs to begin with.

 

Agreed. All I am saying is that apple is definitely not the only one and not the worst one. It is the just the one you hear the most news about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. All I am saying is that apple is definitely not the only one and not the worst one. It is the just the one you hear the most news about.

 

Euhmmmm... which one is worse.

 

Like I said, patent trolls don't count.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Euhmmmm... which one is worse.

 

Like I said, patent trolls don't count.

 

here are some rediculous patents, yes Apple is in there too. But so is google and microsoft: http://technewspedia.com/10-ridiculous-patents-that-show-why-there-are-so-many-lawsuits-in-the-u-s/

 

how do patent trolls not count? lol honestly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here are some rediculous patents, yes Apple is in there too. But so is google and microsoft: http://technewspedia...its-in-the-u-s/

 

how do patent trolls not count? lol honestly

 

Nope, I didn't meant insane patents. I agree on that one, they are all BS.

I meant insane stuff in court (I know they all have to defend their patents)

 

And you still didn't answer my question: who is worse than Apple at this moment :P

But not sure who's fault it is: the companies or the system.

 

And patent trolls don't count, because there only reason of existence is pulling this kind of BS. Of course they are the worst XD

 

 

How trollear patents

 

Halliburton and IBM showed off with this idea : A method to profit by buying the patent of a company that does not have the resources to maintain its patent portfolio. Do patent trolls will have to pay now?

 

=> Genious XD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, I didn't meant insane patents. I agree on that one, they are all BS.

I meant insane stuff in court (I know they all have to defend their patents)

 

And you still didn't answer my question: who is worse than Apple at this moment :P

But not sure who's fault it is: the companies or the system.

 

And patent trolls don't count, because there only reason of existence is pulling this kind of BS. Of course they are the worst XD

 

 

 

 

=> Genious XD

 

Lol well lets agree that a lot of patents are rediculous and the system needs to change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.