If theyre so cheap, they might be like current AMD CPU: decent i guess, but not nearly as good as Intel

People always say that about AMD. My argument is that most people/programs don't even come close to utilizing the full potential of any new chip. I will always buy AMD. Always have and always will. In my opinion I think they are better and they are much more reasonably priced.

With Intel you pay double for the name. AMD's prices prove that.

People always say that about AMD. My argument is that most people/programs don't even come close to utilizing the full potential of any new chip. I will always buy AMD. Always have and always will. In my opinion I think they are better and they are much more reasonably priced. With Intel you pay double for the name. AMD's prices prove that.

so dam true

I always buy amd (except for laptops => amd laptops cpu suck at my opinion ^^): the price/quality ratio is much better then Intel (Intel is better but way more expensive)

sandy bridge takes a 3.4GHz proc to 4.5 and above, and is super reliable. AMD, you only get maybe like .5 extra GHz