Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Google weighs preferential treatment for encrypted websites

Although last week's Heartbleed bug is a reminder that online security is a work in progress, a key Google engineer is looking at new ways to shore up the internet, including featuring encrypted sites more prominently in the company's search results.

The Wall Street Journal today reported that search giant Google is exploring new ways to leverage its sizable influence in the online community to push for the widespread adoption of website encryption.

One of the ways Google hopes to accomplish this task is by offering incentives to websites who play ball, which could include a "boost" in search engine results for those who encrypt data between end users and company servers.

Leading the charge is Matt Cutts, a so-called "distinguished engineer" at Google, who recently offered some insight into the company's internal discussions during a recent Search Marketing Expo (SMX) in San Jose.

One man's opinion?

Google's Cutts certainly has credentials powerful enough to shape such change, but according to a separate report from Search Engine Land, the concept may only be one man's opinion at this early stage.

"[Cutts] said it was his personal opinion and not everyone within Google agreed with him at this point," elaborated news editor Barry Schwartz.

Although web experts may be divided on adopting website encryption across the board, few can dispute that an additional level of online security can only be a good thing for end users.

For example, such a change could ultimately benefit websites looking for new ways to game Google's search results, which currently penalizes internet portals offering malicious software or whose sites load slower than expected.

  • Still in search of the best tablet around? TechRadar rounds them up for you.
mf.gif


rc.img
rc.img
rc.img

a2.imga2t.imgZ_3EVzG5Voc

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.