Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I tried to detect lag in the ET silEnT server using mtr . this was the output . 

 

 

 

 

rajaah@rajaah-Aspire-5540:~$ mtr --report 108.61.21.93
HOST: rajaah-Aspire-5540          Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1.|-- MyDslModem.local.lan       0.0%    10    0.5   0.4   0.4   0.5   0.0
  2.|-- ???                       100.0    10    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 
 
I am unable to understand what is goin on . Is this the reason for my lag ? 
 
 
 
 
p.s : If i must post it in ET support section , please move it there . 
  • Clan Friend
Posted

$ man mtr

[cut]

--report
              This option puts mtr into report mode.  When in this  mode,  mtr
              will  run  for  the number of cycles specified by the -c option,
              and then print statistics and exit.
[cut]

I guess it defaults to 10, since I can omit -c and I get 10 cycles, so that's not the problem.

 

Have you waited long enough for it to run?

 

Have you tried without --report first? (you can still pause it with 'p', so you can copy the text, and space to resume)

 

Anyway, if you want the report, you should redirect it to some file, for example for 20 cycles:

$ mtr -c 20 -r 108.61.21.93 > report.txt
 

I would try it without -r (the same as --report) first, and see what I get

Posted

$ man mtr

I guess it defaults to 10, since I can omit -c and I get 10 cycles, so that's not the problem.

 

Have you waited long enough for it to run?

 

Have you tried without --report first? (you can still pause it with 'p', so you can copy the text, and space to resume)

 

Anyway, if you want the report, you should redirect it to some file, for example for 20 cycles:

$ mtr -c 20 -r 108.61.21.93 > report.txt

 

I would try it without -r (the same as --report) first, and see what I get

i got the same output in the report too 

 

 

HOST: rajaah-Aspire-5540          Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1.|-- MyDslModem.local.lan       0.0%    20    0.5   0.4   0.3   0.5   0.0
  2.|-- ???                       100.0    20    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 
 
edit : whn i do it without report also  , it shows the same . Do you think there is problem with my drivers ? 
  • Clan Friend
Posted

 

edit : whn i do it without report also  , it shows the same . Do you think there is problem with my drivers ? 

 

so you don't get past second hop?

 

can you just ping that server's ip, or try something else, like mtr google.com

 

try this:

$ mtr --no-dns -u 108.61.21.93

 

$ traceroute 108.61.21.93

 

Posted

this was what i got after 50 cycles .

 

 

My traceroute [v0.80]

rajaah-Aspire-5540 (0.0.0.0) Fri Mar 29 18:25:36 2013

Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit

Packets Pings

Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev

1. 192.168.1.1 0.0% 50 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.0

2. 117.202.80.1 91.8% 50 14.6 15.1 14.6 15.6 0.5

3. 218.248.161.234 93.9% 50 15.4 14.6 14.1 15.4 0.8

4. 218.248.255.30 93.9% 50 14.8 14.8 14.6 15.0 0.2

5. 115.114.130.49 95.9% 50 15.2 15.2 15.2 15.2 0.0

6. 180.87.36.9 98.0% 50 15.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 0.0

7. 180.87.12.53 95.9% 50 478.2 475.9 473.7 478.2 3.2

8. 180.87.12.110 98.0% 50 483.8 483.8 483.8 483.8 0.0

9. ???

10. ???

11. 66.198.127.1 93.9% 50 475.1 469.0 465.6 475.1 5.4

12. 66.198.127.82 93.9% 50 492.7 483.3 470.1 492.7 11.7

13. ???

14. 193.251.251.102 98.0% 50 583.9 583.9 583.9 583.9 0.0

15. 108.61.93.105 95.8% 49 579.7 575.4 571.1 579.7 6.1

108.61.1.13

16. 108.61.79.38 95.8% 49 566.6 571.5 566.6 576.4 6.9

17. ???

 

 

 

P.s : my net is a bit shitty at that moment . I will paste the result when my net works normal .

  • Clan Friend
Posted

wow lots of packet loss, that was made with udp, right? (-u option)

 

can you try just:

$ ping -c 20 108.61.21.93

 

or

$ ping -c 20 117.202.80.1

(that should be your isp, right?)

Posted

wow lots of packet loss, that was made with udp, right? (-u option)

 

can you try just:

$ ping -c 20 108.61.21.93

 

or

$ ping -c 20 117.202.80.1

(that should be your isp, right?)

this is ping to isp :

 

rajaah@rajaah-Aspire-5540:~$ ping -c 20 117.202.80.1

PING 117.202.80.1 (117.202.80.1) 56(84) bytes of data.

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=254 time=14.0 ms

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=2 ttl=254 time=14.6 ms

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=3 ttl=254 time=14.6 ms

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=4 ttl=254 time=13.8 ms

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=5 ttl=254 time=14.2 ms

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=6 ttl=254 time=15.0 ms

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=7 ttl=254 time=14.9 ms

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=8 ttl=254 time=14.5 ms

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=9 ttl=254 time=14.8 ms

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=10 ttl=254 time=14.9 ms

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=11 ttl=254 time=15.8 ms

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=12 ttl=254 time=15.6 ms

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=13 ttl=254 time=14.5 ms

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=14 ttl=254 time=14.3 ms

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=15 ttl=254 time=15.0 ms

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=16 ttl=254 time=15.0 ms

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=17 ttl=254 time=13.8 ms

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=18 ttl=254 time=14.5 ms

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=19 ttl=254 time=14.5 ms

64 bytes from 117.202.80.1: icmp_req=20 ttl=254 time=15.4 ms

 

--- 117.202.80.1 ping statistics ---

20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19029ms

rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 13.848/14.742/15.829/0.526 ms

 

 

 

this is ping to server :

 

rajaah@rajaah-Aspire-5540:~$ ping -c 20 108.61.21.93

PING 108.61.21.93 (108.61.21.93) 56(84) bytes of data.

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=1 ttl=114 time=265 ms

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=2 ttl=114 time=263 ms

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=3 ttl=114 time=264 ms

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=4 ttl=114 time=263 ms

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=5 ttl=114 time=264 ms

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=6 ttl=114 time=264 ms

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=7 ttl=114 time=264 ms

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=8 ttl=114 time=264 ms

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=9 ttl=114 time=264 ms

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=10 ttl=114 time=263 ms

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=11 ttl=114 time=264 ms

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=12 ttl=114 time=264 ms

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=13 ttl=114 time=264 ms

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=14 ttl=114 time=263 ms

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=15 ttl=114 time=264 ms

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=16 ttl=114 time=264 ms

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=17 ttl=114 time=264 ms

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=18 ttl=114 time=264 ms

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=19 ttl=114 time=264 ms

64 bytes from 108.61.21.93: icmp_req=20 ttl=114 time=263 ms

 

--- 108.61.21.93 ping statistics ---

20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19020ms

rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 263.061/264.374/265.635/0.567 ms

 

 

 

Edit : I had not tried the traceroute you mentioned earlier but i am unable to understand the output .

 

here's it though .

 

rajaah@rajaah-Aspire-5540:~$ traceroute 108.61.21.93

traceroute to 108.61.21.93 (108.61.21.93), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets

1 MyDslModem.local.lan (192.168.1.1) 2.207 ms 2.144 ms 2.105 ms

2 117.193.224.1 (117.193.224.1) 31.926 ms 31.907 ms 31.869 ms

3 218.248.161.238 (218.248.161.238) 31.830 ms 31.796 ms 31.754 ms

4 218.248.255.82 (218.248.255.82) 32.160 ms 34.508 ms 36.536 ms

5 115.114.130.49.STATIC-Chennai.vsnl.net.in (115.114.130.49) 39.382 ms 42.356 ms 49.350 ms

6 172.29.250.34 (172.29.250.34) 81.397 ms 52.137 ms 53.332 ms

7 * * if-2-590.tcore2.L78-London.as6453.net (80.231.131.113) 561.636 ms

8 * * *

9 Vlan524.icore2.LDN-London.as6453.net (195.219.83.86) 287.426 ms 287.404 ms 288.044 ms

10 * * *

11 * * *

12 108.61.1.13.choopa.net (108.61.1.13) 278.258 ms ve66-br2.pnj1.choopa.net (108.61.93.105) 283.869 ms 108.61.1.13.choopa.net (108.61.1.13) 282.246 ms

13 ethernet1-2-2-c1-16-b2-1.pnj1.choopa.net (108.61.79.38) 274.632 ms 278.721 ms ethernet1-2-1-c1-16-b2-1.pnj1.choopa.net (108.61.79.34) 275.370 ms

14 * * *

15 * * *

16 * * *

17 * * *

18 * * *

19 * * *

20 * * *

21 * * *

22 * * *

23 * * *

24 * * *

25 * * *

26 * * *

27 * * *

28 * * *

29 * * *

30 * * *

  • Clan Friend
Posted

 

this is ping to server :

 

rajaah@rajaah-Aspire-5540:~$ ping -c 20 108.61.21.93

[cut]

--- 108.61.21.93 ping statistics ---

20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19020ms

rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 263.061/264.374/265.635/0.567 ms

so it seems your ping is stable (0.567ms mdev is good) and you have no packet loss...

 

it could be that some nodes cut mtr traffic, or that you had lag only that day

 

but your ping to the server is really stable

Posted

yeah , but still , when i use the udp method , i get the same output [ lots of packet loss ] .

any specific reason for it ?

  • Clan Friend
Posted

yeah , but still , when i use the udp method , i get the same output [ lots of packet loss ] .

any specific reason for it ?

it could be that they limit traffic for those packets in some nodes you have to pass through

 

anyway, if your ping to the destination is stable and without packet loss, I don't think it's necessary to use mtr. You use that when you have an unstable or higher than usual ping, and you want to know where exactly the slowdown occurs.

Posted

it could be that they limit traffic for those packets in some nodes you have to pass through

 

anyway, if your ping to the destination is stable and without packet loss, I don't think it's necessary to use mtr. You use that when you have an unstable or higher than usual ping, and you want to know where exactly the slowdown occurs.

okay :) thanks for the info . May be dare should create a new level for you , admin level 99 "THE DOCTOR" :) i'll report it in tracker provided he is in a good mood :P

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.