Teardown reveals $199 Kindle Fire costs $201.70 to build

[Corey]

A recent teardown of Amazon’s new Kindle Fire tablet reveals that the company is likely selling its new Android-powered slate at a loss. Market research and intelligence firm IHS iSuppli on Friday published its findings after disassembling the new Amazon Kindle Fire tablet and examining its components. Following its analysis, the firm determined that Amazon’s Build of Materials cost is $185.60, and its total cost including manufacturing-related fees is $201.70 per Kindle Fire. Prior to obtaining and disassembling the tablet, IHS had estimated its parts and manufacturing costs to be $209.63 per unit combined. Read on for more.

“The Kindle Fire, at a retail price point of $199, is sold at a loss by Amazon, just as the basic Kindle is also sold at a loss at the current $79 retail price point,” Andrew Rassweiler, senior director of teardown services for IHS, said in a statement. “Amazon makes its money not on Kindle hardware, but on the paid content and other products it plans to sell the consumer through the Kindle. This is a similar business model to wireless companies such as AT&T or Verizon. They sell you a phone that costs them $400 to $600 or more to make for a price of only $200. However, they expect to more than make up for that loss with a two-year service contract.”

IHS notes that its determination covers parts and manufacturing only, and does not take into account software, licensing, marketing, royalties and other related expenditures. The firm’s full press release follows below.

Amazon Kindle Fire Costs $201.70 to Manufacture

November 18, 2011

ANDREW RASSWEILER

Amazon’s Kindle Fire media tablet carries a BOM cost of $185.60, according to preliminary findings from the IHS iSuppli Teardown Analysis Service. When manufacturing services expenses are added, the cost increases to $201.70, as shown in the table below.

This is slightly lower than the IHS virtual estimate of the Kindle’s cost issued in September of a BOM amounting to $191.65, and a total of $209.63, when factoring in the manufacturing and the margin expenses.

Please note that this teardown assessment is preliminary in nature, and accounts only for hardware costs and does not include additional expenses such as software, licensing, royalties or other expenditures.

“The Kindle Fire, at a retail price point of $199, is sold at a loss by Amazon, just as the basic Kindle is also sold at a loss at the current $79 retail price point,” said Andrew Rassweiler, senior director, teardown services for IHS. “Amazon makes its money not on Kindle hardware, but on the paid content and other products it plans to sell the consumer through the Kindle. This is a similar business model to wireless companies such as AT&T or Verizon. They sell you a phone that costs them $400 to $600 or more to make for a price of only $200. However, they expect to more than make up for that loss with a two-year service contract.”

Surprise design wins in the Kindle fire include the use of a touch screen control

-

 

integrated source from the previously unknown source Ilitek and a wireless local area network (WLAN) module from new supplier Jorjin.

The use of an unfamiliar source for the touch screen controller integrated circuit (IC) reflects the growing trend of new suppliers entering the market. Amid booming sales for touch screen devices, IC suppliers have jumped into the fray to satisfy the increase in demand. This trend toward employing lesser-known sources is evident in recent designs including the Vizio tablet, which featured a touch control IC from EETI—and the Lenovo A60 smartphone, which employed a touch control IC from FocalTech Systems.

The use of the Jorjin WLAN module also represents a surprise, given that most tablet designs employ more complex combo solutions from Broadcom or Texas Instruments. The Jorjin device provides a cheaper approach to implementing WLAN support, at just $4.50, yielding a $1 savings in BOM costs.

Texas Instruments Inc. (TI) dominates the Kindle Fire design. 

Most notably, TI contributes the applications processor, which provides the core functionality of the tablet. The TI OMAP4430 processor costs $14.65, accounting for 7.9 percent of the Kindle Fire’s total BOM. However, TI also supplies other devices, including the power management device and the audio codec. This gives TI a total of $24 per each Kindle, or 12.9 percent of the BOM.

TI’s OMAP4430 applications processor has been identified in an increasing number of designs dissected by the IHS, including Research In Motion’s PlayBook RDJ21WW tablet, as well as the Motorola Droid Bionic XT875 and LG Optimus 3D P920 smartphones. The OMAP4430 is a dual-core ARM Cortex-A9, 1GHz processor with a IVA 3 Hardware Accelerator and a SGX540 3D graphics core. The device supports 1080P 2-D and 720P 3-D graphics, and is produced using 45nm process geometry.

The single most expensive subsystem in the Kindle Fire is the display and touch screen, at a combined cost of $87.00, or 46.9 percent of the BOM.

 Amazon sources the display from two companies: LG Display and E Ink Holdings. The display uses E Ink’s FFS technology, which LG Display has licensed.

Improved production yields and efficiencies have assisted greatly in reducing the cost of FFS tablet displays. In the same vein, touch screens have made big strides in cost reduction during the course of 2011.

The Kindle Fire incorporates 8 gigabytes of eMMC NAND flash memory. In the individual Kindle Fire torn down by IHS iSuppli, the NAND flash was supplied by Samsung. The eMMC NAND flash is fairly popular with most manufacturers, as it includes memory management circuitry.

IHS had assumed originally that the Kindle Fire might have as much as 8 gigabits of low-power DDR2 DRAM memory. In fact, the Kindle Fire ships with only 4 gigabits. This shaved off a few dollars from our previous cost estimates. Elpida was the supplier of the DRAM in the individual Kindle Fire torn down by IHS iSuppli.

Together, the NAND and DRAM form a memory subsystem costing $22.10, or 11.9 percent of the total BOM.

 

View the full article