Piglet Posted July 28, 2009 Posted July 28, 2009 Hi, it's Piggy, and I was wondering which you preferred, Stun grenades or Flash grenades. Just want opinions! In my opinion, I think stuns are a bit better Quote
Phant0mEcho3 Posted July 29, 2009 Posted July 29, 2009 I normally use stuns cause their movement is impaired while a flash someone with an lmg can still keep spamming in a wider array. I think its all preference. Quote
Loki Posted July 29, 2009 Posted July 29, 2009 FRAG!!!!! stun and flash are all good, but if you kill them then they dont move or shoot back either......including that dude with the LMG. Like was said before...its all personal preference. Most of my kits include stuns and frags. The target dont move too well if either of those go off near them. With flashes I tend to blind myself anyway Quote
Kinan Eldari Posted July 29, 2009 Posted July 29, 2009 Flash. I used smokers before to block their vision of me for various reasons. But I had trouble using that offensively because I was just as troubled by the smoke as they were. To change this, I decided that blinding my targets themselves would grant me both a chance to get away if needed and a good chance to attack without the impairment of the smoke. Stun grenades I just don't like. Quote
milli vanilli Posted July 29, 2009 Posted July 29, 2009 yeah a frag works, but nothing is more satisfying than flashing a sniper/lmg camper from a floor below then running up and knifing his ass Quote
PTRS-41 Posted July 30, 2009 Posted July 30, 2009 Flash. I used smokers before to block their vision of me for various reasons. But I had trouble using that offensively because I was just as troubled by the smoke as they were. To change this, I decided that blinding my targets themselves would grant me both a chance to get away if needed and a good chance to attack without the impairment of the smoke. Stun grenades I just don't like. +1 i agree, i used to do the same but lmg spammers still sprayed in the smoke ...so annoying,......... so i changed my loadouts to flash and stun now ...... flash has more radius and higher area of effect , as a result use carefully coz u will flash urself........NOOBIES with BOOBIES Stun is good as it has short radius, so u can just throw a stun like 10 - 15m in front of u at an enemy if ur reloading, the enemy will be impaired but it wont effect u , may be a slight blur..... whereas flash anywhere within 50 m ur gona go BLURRY ..... so flash is more deadly if used carefully but stun is more convenient and does the same job within less radius, without affectin u too much ............ I still have to use a class with 3 flash nades and use all 3 flashes to flash someone 3 times for like 15- 20 seconds b4 killing them , its like DEVOUR COMMAND of KODO BEATS from warcraft ( EAT SLOWLY ) Quote
Enter Shikari Posted July 30, 2009 Posted July 30, 2009 I prefer to use flash because you can definately tell if you have hit some by the damage indicator. Quote
PTRS-41 Posted July 31, 2009 Posted July 31, 2009 flash all the way to destroy PTRS aim hehe ok ! but make sure u kill me...... otherwise if i recover ....... u ll be a dead man Quote
FatWolf Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 I like both quite frankly, it just depends on what I am using. For my more mobile classes (i.e. Shotty/Smg/Extreme Conditioning based) I tend to use flash for more of a dodge and weave kind of thing. And for my less mobile classes (i.e. Sniper/Lmg) I tend to use stun, just gives me more options in the midst of battle. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.