Jump to content

.r...

Regular User
  • Posts

    21
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Profile Information

  • Server
    Jay1
  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • SL
    33403704
  • TB
    10592
  • Location
    pl

Recent Profile Visitors

3533 profile views

.r...'s Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

18

Reputation

  1. Hello, I would like to test out https://github.com/etfdevs/ETe - any admin has idea if I will get banned by your anticheat for using it? Thanks. .r...
  2. https://www.linode.com/docs/networking/diagnostics/diagnosing-network-issues-with-mtr/ If you were actually experiencing packet losses the 37% "loss" visible @ 63.146.26.138 would propagate downwards. It doesn't and the only loss that should interest you is the one next to 8.9.4.227, which is 1 packet in total aka virtually no packet loss. "When analyzing MTR output, you are looking for two things: loss and latency. If you see a percentage of loss at any particular hop, that may be an indication that there is a problem with that particular router. However, it is common practice among some service providers to rate limit the ICMP traffic that MTR uses. This can give the illusion of packet loss when there is in fact no loss. To determine if the loss you’re seeing is real or due to rate limiting, take a look at the subsequent hop. If that hop shows a loss of 0.0%, then you are likely seeing ICMP rate limiting and not actual loss:" That's what the ISP I work for does in his backbone infrastructure and clients quite often send us similar complaints, which are unjustified, because all the packets go through without any problems, but internal routers have more important tasks than reacting to ICMP queries. Were you actually lagging harder than usual on the server/experienced visible packet losses? .r...
  3. Hello, r_primitives 2 is mentioned in original post 🙂 That was the first thing I asked him about, and he claimed it's set to 2. Later I have made sure it's set to 2 by making him execute config with this command in his ET while on Teamviewer. Thanks for the suggestion though - that's indeed usually the source of fps problems in ET! .r...
  4. I think I kind of helped him through Teamviewer. I have determined that he couldn't connect to F|A Beginners because of 2.55 version of ET he was running, which I have fixed by installing 2.60b. And as far as fps/lags go he has Intel HD 4000 integrated graphics. So not much I could do there. Changed battery settings to "performance" both in graphics and system settings, but I doubt it will improve his situation a lot. If you have some more ideas to improve his e-life feel free to share.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.