JohnTV Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 I know what a negative proof is, thanks. I didn't use a fallacy in seriousness, I was merely articulating the banality of your (Spanish) inquisition. I realize sarcasm is not text-friendly, my bad. Perhaps before you berate someone about their "beliefs" though, do some investigative research on your own first, with your brain. It's called 'Thinking'. I was trying to be nice when I said for you to "extrapolate". That would be more rational and analytical, dare I say "scientific", than saying 'prove it to me', and then you yourself could more accurately determine what is "true or even likely". You could develop a belief all on your own. All by yourself. No faith in me necessary. Wait, are we talking about God again?... Here is a great, albeit dated, paper on retrocausality by Hawking called Chronology protection conjecture. I read this in 2001, you could read it now if you haven't. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992PhRvD..46..603H If and when you make it through that, I have more. There's a compendium for you to learn before you could rationally make the determination of what is plausible and implausible. Well, at least before I took you seriously, anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gibson66 Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 (edited) I know what a negative proof is, thanks. I didn't use a fallacy in seriousness, I was merely articulating the banality of your (Spanish) inquisition. I realize sarcasm is not text-friendly, my bad. Perhaps before you berate someone about their "beliefs" though, do some investigative research on your own first, with your brain. It's called 'Thinking'. I was trying to be nice when I said for you to "extrapolate". That would be more rational and analytical, dare I say "scientific", than saying 'prove it to me', and then you yourself could more accurately determine what is "true or even likely". You could develop a belief all on your own. All by yourself. No faith in me necessary. Wait, are we talking about God again?... Here is a great, albeit dated, paper on retrocausality by Hawking called Chronology protection conjecture. I read this in 2001, you could read it now if you haven't. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992PhRvD..46..603H If and when you make it through that, I have more. There's a compendium for you to learn before you could rationally make the determination of what is plausible and implausible. Well, at least before I took you seriously, anyway. edit Edited May 22, 2015 by gibson66 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnTV Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 EDIT: I have something written but honestly, you're last sentence confirms that you're just a snarky shit with an opinion. Dime a dozen on the internet. You want to believe that there's some military base in the arctic where time-traveling goes on, go right the f*** ahead. It means that I think you're a troll, trolling me. Dime a dozen on the internet. EDIT: Never asked you to believe anything I said at all. Double EDIT: CERN is in Switzerland. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gibson66 Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 (edited) It means that I think you're a troll, trolling me. Dime a dozen on the internet. EDIT: Never asked you to believe anything I said at all. edit Edited May 22, 2015 by gibson66 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnTV Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Yep. I'm the troll. Agreed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gibson66 Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 (edited) The John, on 02 May 2015 - 12:40 PM, said: Agreed. edit Edited May 22, 2015 by gibson66 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnTV Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 So tell me, do they keep hitler's zombie in the antarctic time-travel base? You've been reduced to total baiting nonsense so easily. I have stuff to do, cya. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gibson66 Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 (edited) You've been reduced to total baiting nonsense so easily. I have stuff to do, cya. edit Edited May 22, 2015 by gibson66 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrustIssue Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Guys, off topic, let's keep talking about time travel instead of this BS 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gibson66 Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 (edited) Guys, off topic, let's keep talking about time travel instead of this BS edit Edited May 22, 2015 by gibson66 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clan Friend SunLight Posted May 2, 2015 Clan Friend Share Posted May 2, 2015 In the military/private sector, technologies are 500 years ahead of consumer-level possibility. That 500 years gap must be a recent achievement, otherwise we would have to guess in 1500 they were secretly using smartphones Have you seen Bina 48? Well, this is more like a well done trick rather than the real thing. My cat doesn't talk but he's smarter than that ^^ Maybe in the future they will make them smart enough that you can't tell If you're talking with a human or a robot in a real conversation (and perhaps they will acheve this ability in a way that totally differs from the way our brain does it, like, a car moves, but it moves in a different way than a horse does). But I'm afraid I won't be there to see it... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platonic Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 In the military/private sector, technologies are 500 years ahead of consumer-level possibility. Can't wait until we all have our personal atom bomb... Maybe in the future they will make them smart enough that you can't tell If you're talking with a human or a robot in a real conversation (and perhaps they will acheve this ability in a way that totally differs from the way our brain does it, like, a car moves, but it moves in a different way than a horse does). But I'm afraid I won't be there to see it... I'm actually pretty glad I won't be there to see it. For as long, I can naively believe in the uniqueness of conscience. Although, now that I think of it... Nothing will be able to proof the conscience of such an android. At last, no one can proof the non-conscience of a rock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anton Chigurh Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Guys, off topic, let's keep talking about time travel instead of this BS Someone should travel back in time and delete this topic 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Levi Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 I'd go back to just before I met my first love and not get with her. I wouldn't of messed up my first love. lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaKy Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 I wouldn't of messed up my first love. lol. Didn't mess it up but sacrificed the long hair and guitar playing for it right at a time when I was in the zone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.