Jump to content
Krise

Timetravel?

Recommended Posts

I know what a negative proof is, thanks. I didn't use a fallacy in seriousness, I was merely articulating the banality of your (Spanish) inquisition. I realize sarcasm is not text-friendly, my bad. Perhaps before you berate someone about their "beliefs" though, do some investigative research on your own first, with your brain. It's called 'Thinking'. I was trying to be nice when I said for you to "extrapolate". That would be more rational and analytical, dare I say "scientific", than saying 'prove it to me', and then you yourself could more accurately determine what is "true or even likely". You could develop a belief all on your own. All by yourself. No faith in me necessary. Wait, are we talking about God again?... Here is a great, albeit dated, paper on retrocausality by Hawking called Chronology protection conjecture. I read this in 2001, you could read it now if you haven't. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992PhRvD..46..603H If and when you make it through that, I have more. There's a compendium for you to learn before you could rationally make the determination of what is plausible and implausible. Well, at least before I took you seriously, anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know what a negative proof is, thanks. I didn't use a fallacy in seriousness, I was merely articulating the banality of your (Spanish) inquisition. I realize sarcasm is not text-friendly, my bad. Perhaps before you berate someone about their "beliefs" though, do some investigative research on your own first, with your brain. It's called 'Thinking'. I was trying to be nice when I said for you to "extrapolate". That would be more rational and analytical, dare I say "scientific", than saying 'prove it to me', and then you yourself could more accurately determine what is "true or even likely". You could develop a belief all on your own. All by yourself. No faith in me necessary. Wait, are we talking about God again?... Here is a great, albeit dated, paper on retrocausality by Hawking called Chronology protection conjecture. I read this in 2001, you could read it now if you haven't. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992PhRvD..46..603H If and when you make it through that, I have more. There's a compendium for you to learn before you could rationally make the determination of what is plausible and implausible. Well, at least before I took you seriously, anyway.

edit

Edited by gibson66

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EDIT: I have something written but honestly, you're last sentence confirms that you're just a snarky shit with an opinion. Dime a dozen on the internet. You want to believe that there's some military base in the arctic where time-traveling goes on, go right the f*** ahead.

 

It means that I think you're a troll, trolling me. Dime a dozen on the internet. ;)

 

EDIT: Never asked you to believe anything I said at all.

 

Double EDIT: CERN is in Switzerland.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It means that I think you're a troll, trolling me. Dime a dozen on the internet. ;)

 

EDIT: Never asked you to believe anything I said at all.

edit

Edited by gibson66

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. I'm the troll.

 

Agreed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The John, on 02 May 2015 - 12:40 PM, said:

 

Agreed.

edit

Edited by gibson66

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So tell me, do they keep hitler's zombie in the antarctic time-travel base? 

 

You've been reduced to total baiting nonsense so easily. I have stuff to do, cya. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You've been reduced to total baiting nonsense so easily. I have stuff to do, cya. :)

edit

Edited by gibson66

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, off topic, let's keep talking about time travel instead of this BS :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, off topic, let's keep talking about time travel instead of this BS :)

edit

Edited by gibson66
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the military/private sector, technologies are 500 years ahead of consumer-level possibility.

That 500 years gap must be a recent achievement, otherwise we would have to guess in 1500 they were secretly using smartphones :D

 

Have you seen Bina 48?

Well, this is more like a well done trick rather than the real thing. My cat doesn't talk but he's smarter than that ^^

 

Maybe in the future they will make them smart enough that you can't tell If you're talking with a human or a robot in a real conversation (and perhaps they will acheve this ability in a way that totally differs from the way our brain does it, like, a car moves, but it moves in a different way than a horse does).

 

But I'm afraid I won't be there to see it...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

In the military/private sector, technologies are 500 years ahead of consumer-level possibility.

Can't wait until we all have our personal atom bomb...

 

Maybe in the future they will make them smart enough that you can't tell If you're talking with a human or a robot in a real conversation (and perhaps they will acheve this ability in a way that totally differs from the way our brain does it, like, a car moves, but it moves in a different way than a horse does).

 

But I'm afraid I won't be there to see it...

I'm actually pretty glad I won't be there to see it. For as long, I can naively believe in the uniqueness of conscience. Although, now that I think of it... Nothing will be able to proof the conscience of such an android. At last, no one can proof the non-conscience of a rock.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, off topic, let's keep talking about time travel instead of this BS :)

Someone should travel back in time and delete this topic :)

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd go back to just before I met my first love and not get with her.

I wouldn't of messed up my first love. lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't of messed up my first love. lol.

 

Didn't mess it up but sacrificed the long hair and guitar playing for it right at a time when I was in the zone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×