Jump to content

English Wikipedia anti-SOPA blackout


DJ aka GDR DJ

Recommended Posts

English Wikipedia anti-SOPA blackout

 

Today, the Wikipedia community announced its decision to black out the English-language Wikipedia for 24 hours, worldwide, beginning at 05:00 UTC on Wednesday, January 18 (you can read the statement from the Wikimedia Foundation here). The blackout is a protest against proposed legislation in the United States - the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) in the U.S. House of Representatives, and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA) in the U.S. Senate - that, if passed, would seriously damage the free and open Internet including, Wikipedia.

 

This will be the first time the English Wikipedia has ever staged a public protest of this nature, and it's a decision that was not made lightly. Here's how it's been described by the three Wikipedia administrators who formally facilitated the community's discussion. From the public statement, signed by User: NuclearWarfare, User: Risks and User: Billingshurst:

 

It is the opinion of the English Wikipedia community that both of these bills, if passed, would be devastating to the free and open web.

 

Over the course of the past 72 hours, over 1800 Wikipedians have joined together to discuss proposed actions that the community might wish to take against SOPA and PIPA. This is by far the largest level of participation in a community discussion ever seen on Wikipedia, Which Illustrates the level of concern that Wikipedians feel about this proposed legislation. The overwhelming Majority of participants support community action to encourage greater public action in response to these two bills. Of the proposals considered by Wikipedians, those that would result in a "blackout" of the English Wikipedia, in concert with similar blackouts on other websites opposed to SOPA and PIPA received the strongest support.

 

On careful review of this discussion, the closing administrators note the broad-based support for action Wikipedians from around the world, not just from within the United States. The primary objection to a global blackout came from those who preferred that the blackout be limited to readers from the United States, with the rest of the world seeing a simple banner notice instead. We also noted that roughly 55% of those supporting a blackout preferred that it be a global one, with many pointing to concerns about similar legislation in other nations.

 

In making this decision, Wikipedians will be criticized for seeming to abandon neutrality to take a political position. That's a real, legitimate issue. We want people to trust Wikipedia, not worry that it is trying to propagandize them.

 

But although Wikipedia's articles are neutral, its existence is not. As Wikimedia Foundation board member Kat Walsh wrote on one of our mailing lists recently,

 

We depend on a legal infrastructure that makes it possible for us to operate. And we depend on a legal infrastructure so that Allows other sites to host user-contributed material, both information and expression. For the most part, Wikimedia projects are organizing and collecting and summarizing the world's knowledge. We're putting it in context, and showing people how to make sense of it to.

 

But that knowledge has to be published somewhere for anyone to find and use it. Where it can be censored without due process, it hurts the speaker, the public, and Wikimedia. Where you can only speak if you have sufficient resources to fight legal challenges, or if your views are pre-approved by someone who does, the same narrow set of ideas already popular will continue to be all anyone has meaningful access to.

 

The decision to shut down the English Wikipedia was not made by me, it was made by editors, through a consensus decision-making process. But I support it.

 

Like Kat and the rest of the Wikimedia Foundation Board, I have begun to think of Wikipedia Increasingly's public voice, and the goodwill people have for Wikipedia, as a resource that wants to be used for the benefit of the public. Readers trust Wikipedia because they know that despite its faults, Wikipedia's heart is in the right place. It's not aiming to monetize their eyeballs or make them believe some Particular thing, or sell them a product. Wikipedia has no hidden agenda: it just wants to be helpful.

 

That's less true of other sites. Most are Commercially motivated: their purpose is to make money. That does not mean they do not have a desire to make the world a better place - many do! - But it does mean that their positions and actions need to be understood in the context of conflicting interests.

 

My hope is that when Wikipedia shuts down on January 18, people will understand that we're doing it for our readers. We support everyone's right to freedom of thought and freedom of expression. We think everyone should have access to educational material on a wide range of subjects, even if they can not pay for it. We believe in a free and open Internet where information can be shared without impediment. We believe that new proposed laws like SOPA and PIPA, and other similar laws under discussion inside and outside the United States - do not advance the interests of the general public. You can read a very good list of reasons to oppose SOPA and PIPA here, from the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

 

Why is this a global action, rather than US-only? And why now, if some American legislators appear to be in tactical retreat on SOPA?

 

The reality is that we do not think SOPA is going away, and PIPA is silent quite active. Moreover, SOPA PIPA and are just indicators of a much broader problem. All around the world, we're seeing the development of legislation intended to fight online piracy, and regulate the Internet in other ways, that hurt online freedoms. Our concern extends beyond SOPA and PIPA: they are just part of the problem. We want the Internet to remain free and open, everywhere, for everyone.

 

Make your voice heard!

 

Bookmark with Facebook Share on Twitter Share on reddit.com Share on Digg.com

 

On January 18, we hope you'll agree with us, and will do what you can to make your own voice heard.

 

source

 

DJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah facebook should get on that shit. That would really cause uproar.. And those who spend so much time on facebook they dont even know about this bill, will finally side against it lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since when do politicans really care if people are for a bill or against it

Right, it's all about those who pay some extra bucks in their pockets and no, that's not the common man.

 

 

Good job wiki! :D

Actually Wiki should've blacked out every page they've got. Well, SOPA really affects only the USA but every wikipeadia language had to bend to SOPA if this bill would pass.

 

 

Would like to see Facebook doing same thing like that,many people would go crazy i guess :D

Facebook going down for something "unimportant" as SOPA? That would be perfect because even those "Hey, I'm just here to spam my friends with games" people might get some education about SOPA from that or finally start getting a real life. :D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.