No we are not, we're saying he shouldn't control over 50% of our media coverage - it's not about him earning money, if he's "worked hard" then he's entitled to a profit of course (and he makes more than enough off what he already owns) - but money isn't the issue here, it's about stopping one person controlling our media - he's trying to do what Hitler did with controlling the media of Germany. He wants only his opinion to be expressed, and he'll succeed eventually if he gets more than 50% coverage.
16 replies to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users